Study Beitzah folio 37B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
is not in accordance with the opinion of R' Dosa. As it is taught in a baraita: R' Dosa says, and some say Abba Shaul says: One who purchases an animal from another on the eve of a Festival, even if he did not deliver it to him until the Festival itself, it is as the feet of the purchaser. And one w
The Talmud rejects the assertion that this is a contradiction. You can even say that the Mishnah is in accordance with R' Dosa, and it is not difficult. Here, in the baraita, it is referring to a town that has only one shepherd. In that case the owner knows with certainty beforehand that he will b
Rabba bar bar Ḥana said that R' Yoḥanan said: The halakha is in accordance with the opinion of R' Dosa, that animals given to a shepherd are as the feet of the shepherd. The Talmud asks: And did R' Yoḥanan actually say this? But didn’t R' Yoḥanan say a general principle that the halakha always foll
The Talmud answers: And did we not establish that the baraita of R' Dosa is dealing with a different case than the Mishnah, that here in the baraita it is dealing with a town with one shepherd, whereas there in the Mishnah it is dealing with a town with two shepherds? There is consequently no cont
§ A baraita states: In the case of two people who borrowed one robe in partnership from a third party, this person in order to go to the study hall with it in the morning and that person in order to enter a wedding feast with it in the evening, and this one made a joining of Shabbat boundaries [ei