Study Bava Metzia folio 55B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
This serves to include misuse of consecrated property less than the value of one peruta in the halakha of restitution to the Temple treasury. The Talmud infers: To the Temple treasury, yes, one must return that which he took; but to an ordinary person [hedyot], no, one need not pay restitution for
Rather, if Rav Ketina’s ruling was stated, this is how it was stated: Rav Ketina says: If the court attends to a monetary claim of the value of one peruta, the judges conclude adjudicating and issue a ruling even if the item in question depreciated to less than the value of one peruta. For the beg
Mishnah: In this Mishnah, as in the previous one, the tanna enumerates several halakhot that share a common element. There are 5 halakhic situations where 1/5th is added to the value of the principal, and these are they: A non-priest who eats either teruma, or teruma of the tithe, which the Levit
Talmud: Rava says: R' Elazar found the halakha in the Mishnah with regard to teruma of the tithe of demai to be difficult. He asked: And since the obligation to tithe demai is by rabbinic law, did the rabbis reinforce their pronouncements and render them parallel to Torah law by requiring the addi
Rav Naḥman said that Shmuel said: In accordance with whose opinion is this Mishnah? It is in accordance with the opinion of R' Meir, who says: The rabbis reinforced their pronouncements and rendered them parallel to Torah law, as it is taught in a baraita: With regard to an agent who brings a bill