Study Bava Metzia folio 51B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
But here, where he says: On the condition that you have no claim of exploitation against me, does the other party know that there will be exploitation so that he will consciously waive his rights to claim compensation in the event that there is? He believes that perhaps there will be no exploitatio
And Shmuel says: I state my opinion even in accordance with the opinion of R' Meir, as R' Meir states his opinion only there, in the case of betrothal, where the husband definitely abrogates Torah law with his condition. But here, who says that either party to the sale will abrogate any Torah law?
Rav Anan says: This matter was explained to me personally by Mar Shmuel. In the case of one who says to another: I will be party to this sale on the condition that you have no claim of exploitation against me, the other party does not have a claim of exploitation against him, as one can waive h
The Talmud raises an objection from a baraita: In the case of one who conducts business on faith; and in the case of one who says to another: I will be party to this sale on the condition that you have no claim of exploitation against me, the exploited party does not have a claim of exploitation a
Abaye said: Based on this proof from the baraita it is clear that Rav stated his opinion in accordance with the opinion of R' Meir, and that Shmuel stated his opinion in accordance with the opinion of R' Yehuda, and this baraita expresses the opinion of R' Yehuda.