Study Bava Kamma folio 2B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
and one who is impure with impurity imparted by a human corpse. A person, a vessel, or food that is rendered impure through contact with an item classified as a primary category of ritual impurity is characterized as a subcategory. In that domain, their subcategories are dissimilar to them, as any
After determining that there are instances where the legal status of subcategories is like that of primary categories, e.g., Shabbat, and there are instances where the legal status of subcategories is dissimilar to that of primary categories, e.g., ritual impurity, the Talmud asks: Here, with regar
§ Seeking to clarify Rav Pappa’s statement, the Talmud cites a baraita that delineates the primary categories of damage. A baraita states: 3 primary categories of damage were stated in the Torah with regard to an ox. An ox causes damage in 3 ways, and each is classified as a distinct primary catego
The Talmud elaborates: From where do we derive the primary category of Goring? The source is as A baraita states: The verse states: “And if an ox gores a man or a woman” (Exodus 21:28); and goring is performed only with a horn, as it is stated: “And Zedekiah, son of Chenaanah, made himself horns of
The Talmud interrupts its citation of the baraita and asks: What is the purpose of citing the additional verse introduced with the term: And the verse also states? The Talmud answers: And if you would say that the first verse cited is not a legitimate source as it is a verse from the Prophets, and