Study Bava Kamma folio 103B with parallel Hebrew-English text, traditional commentary, and modern study tools. Free access to Babylonian Talmud online.
then the additional 1/5th is considered a new principal obligation. The robber pays an additional 1/5th payment apart from the additional 1/5th payment about which he had taken a false oath. If he then takes a false oath concerning the second 1/5th payment, he is assessed an additional 1/5th payment
And such is the halakha with regard to a deposit, as it is stated: “If anyone sins, and commits a trespass against YHWH, and he defrauds his counterpart with regard to a deposit, or with regard to a pledge, or with regard to a robbery, or if he exploited his counterpart; or he has found that which
Talmud: The Mishnah teaches that if a robber took a false oath that he did not rob, he must travel even as far as Media in order to repay the robbery victim. This indicates that if he takes an oath to the robbery victim, yes, he is required to go to any length to repay his obligation, but if he di
The Talmud clarifies: In accordance with whose opinion is the Mishnah written? If one suggests that it is in accordance with the opinion of R' Tarfon, it is not so, because even though the robber took a false oath that he did not rob, R' Tarfon says: He places the stolen item between them and withd
The Talmud answers: Actually, it is in accordance with the opinion of R' Akiva, and when R' Akiva says that the robber is not considered to have returned the stolen item until he pays the value of the stolen item to each and every one of the 5, it is only in a case where the robber took a false oath